Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering

Quantum Zeno-like Paradox for Position Measurements: A Particle Precisely Found in Space is Nowhere to be Found in Hilbert Space

arXiv
Authors: Xabier Oianguren-Asua, Roderich Tumulka

Year

2026

Paper ID

3269

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

107

Citations

N/A

Abstract

On a quantum particle in the unit interval [0,1], perform a position measurement with inaccuracy 1/n and then a quantum measurement of the projection |φranglelangleφ| with some arbitrary but fixed normalized φ. Call the outcomes X in[0,1] and Y in\{0,1\}. We show that in the limit n→infty corresponding to perfect precision for X, the probability of Y=1 tends to 0 for every φ. Since there is no density matrix, pure or mixed, which upon measurement of any |φranglelangleφ| yields outcome 1 with probability 0, our result suggests that a novel type of quantum state beyond Hilbert space is necessary to describe a quantum particle after a perfect position measurement.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Device Fabrication & Process Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • On a quantum particle in the unit interval [0,1], perform a position measurement with inaccuracy 1/n and then a quantum measurement of the projection |φranglelangleφ| with some...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3269

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.