Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Lumped Parameter Modeling of a Quantum Optics Circuit and Decisive Test for Time-Symmetric Physics
arXiv
Authors: Paul J. Werbos
Year
2013
Paper ID
32563
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
205
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper showed how a simple lumped parameter model of a circuit can yield correct quantum mechanical predictions of its behavior, even when there is quantum entanglement between components of that circuit. It addresses an important example, the circuit of the original Bell's Theorem experiments for ideal polarizers. Correct predictions emerge from two alternative simple but time-symmetric models based on classical Markov Random Field across space time. Exact agreement here does not violate Bell's Theorem itself, because the interplay between initial and final outcomes in these calculations does not fall within the CHSH definition of time forwards causality. Both models raise interesting questions for future research. The final section discusses several possible directions for following up on these results, both in lumped system modeling and in more general approaches. The final section proposed a new experiment with three-photon entanglement which could tell us which is true, local realistic MRF models and time-symmetric physics, or conventional predictions assuming the usual collapse of the wave function. The appendix worked out what the conventional predictions would be for the proposed experiment, and also gives a simple master equation version of the collapse assumption which does not involve metaphysical observers. Section A.4 gives the prediction for the new models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper showed how a simple lumped parameter model of a circuit can yield correct quantum mechanical predictions of its behavior, even when there is quantum entanglement...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.