Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Complexity of measurement of a qubit pair
arXiv
Authors: Constantin V. Usenko
Year
2013
Paper ID
32553
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Analysis of the process of accumulation of the results of measurements shows that the success of this process substantially depends on the possibility of coordination of actions of two participants of the process - preparator who prepares the series of the states being measured and registrator who chooses in each event of measurement one of incompatible observables. A new value, the complexity of measurement of a state, is used, this characterizes the number of the measurement events needed for solution of the reconstruction problem. By means of this value it is shown that the dependence of the upper limit of the needed number of measurements on the permissible error is a square law one, so a twofold decrease of permissible error corresponds to a fourfold increase of needed number of measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Analysis of the process of accumulation of the results of measurements shows that the success of this process substantially depends on the possibility of coordination of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.