Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Estimating the ground state energy of the Schrödinger equation for convex potentials
arXiv
Authors: Anargyros Papageorgiou, Iasonas Petras
Year
2013
Paper ID
32520
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In 2011, the fundamental gap conjecture for Schrödinger operators was proven. This can be used to estimate the ground state energy of the time-independent Schrödinger equation with a convex potential and relative error ε. Classical deterministic algorithms solving this problem have cost exponential in the number of its degrees of freedom d. We show a quantum algorithm, that is based on a perturbation method, for estimating the ground state energy with relative error ε. The cost of the algorithm is polynomial in d and ε^{-1}, while the number of qubits is polynomial in d and \logε^{-1}. In addition, we present an algorithm for preparing a quantum state that overlaps within 1-δ, δ\in (0,1), with the ground state eigenvector of the discretized Hamiltonian. This algorithm also approximates the ground state with relative error ε. The cost of the algorithm is polynomial in d, ε^{-1} and δ^{-1}, while the number of qubits is polynomial in d, \logε^{-1} and \logδ^{-1}.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In 2011, the fundamental gap conjecture for Schrödinger operators was proven.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.