Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Span-program-based quantum algorithm for tree detection
arXiv
Authors: Guoming Wang
Year
2013
Paper ID
32476
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Span program is a linear-algebraic model of computation originally proposed for studying the complexity theory. Recently, it has become a useful tool for designing quantum algorithms. In this paper, we present a time-efficient span-program-based quantum algorithm for the following problem. Let T be an arbitrary tree. Given query access to the adjacency matrix of a graph G with n vertices, we need to determine whether G contains T as a subgraph, or G does not contain T as a minor, under the promise that one of these cases holds. We call this problem the subgraph/not-a-minor problem for T. We show that this problem can be solved by a bounded-error quantum algorithm with O(n) query complexity and {O}(n) time complexity. The query complexity is optimal, and the time complexity is tight up to polylog factors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Span program is a linear-algebraic model of computation originally proposed for studying the complexity theory.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.