Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Span-program-based quantum algorithm for tree detection

arXiv
Authors: Guoming Wang

Year

2013

Paper ID

32476

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

138

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Span program is a linear-algebraic model of computation originally proposed for studying the complexity theory. Recently, it has become a useful tool for designing quantum algorithms. In this paper, we present a time-efficient span-program-based quantum algorithm for the following problem. Let T be an arbitrary tree. Given query access to the adjacency matrix of a graph G with n vertices, we need to determine whether G contains T as a subgraph, or G does not contain T as a minor, under the promise that one of these cases holds. We call this problem the subgraph/not-a-minor problem for T. We show that this problem can be solved by a bounded-error quantum algorithm with O(n) query complexity and {O}(n) time complexity. The query complexity is optimal, and the time complexity is tight up to polylog factors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Span program is a linear-algebraic model of computation originally proposed for studying the complexity theory.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #32476

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.