Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Photonic Quantum Computing

Weak-signal conversion from 1550nm to 532nm with 84% efficiency

arXiv
Authors: Aiko Samblowski, Christina E. Vollmer, Christoph Baune, Jaromir Fiurasek, Roman Schnabel

Year

2013

Paper ID

32418

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report on the experimental frequency conversion of a dim, coherent continuous-wave light field from 1550nm to 532nm with an external photon-number conversion efficiency of (84.4 +/- 1.5)%. We used sum-frequency generation, which was realized in a standing-wave cavity built around a periodically poled type I potassium titanyl phosphate (PPKTP) crystal, pumped by an intense field at 810 nm. Our result is in full agreement with a numerical model. For optimized cavity coupler reflectivities it predicts a conversion efficiency of up to 93% using the same PPKTP crystal.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report on the experimental frequency conversion of a dim, coherent continuous-wave light field from 1550nm to 532nm with an external photon-number conversion efficiency of...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1310.0712 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0712 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0712

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #32418

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.