Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Extending robustness & randomization from Consensus to Symmetrization Algorithms

arXiv
Authors: Luca Mazzarella, Francesco Ticozzi, Alain Sarlette

Year

2013

Paper ID

31930

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This work interprets and generalizes consensus-type algorithms as switching dynamics leading to symmetrization of some vector variables with respect to the actions of a finite group. We show how the symmetrization framework we develop covers applications as diverse as consensus on probability distributions (either classical or quantum), uniform random state generation, and open-loop disturbance rejection by quantum dynamical decoupling. Robust convergence results are explicitly provided in a group-theoretic formulation, both for deterministic and for randomized dynamics. This indicates a way to directly extend the robustness and randomization properties of consensus-type algorithms to more fields of application.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This work interprets and generalizes consensus-type algorithms as switching dynamics leading to symmetrization of some vector variables with respect to the actions of a finite...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31930 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.