Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Local Orthogonality provides better upper bound for Hardy's nonlocality
arXiv
Authors: Subhadipa Das, Manik Banik, Md. Rajjak Gazi, Ashutosh Rai, Samir Kunkri
Year
2013
Paper ID
31903
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics---viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not that much successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that, a newly proposed physical principle namely Local Orthogonality does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [Found.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.