Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and particle entanglement

arXiv
Authors: T. Wasak, P. Szankowski, P. Zin, M. Trippenbach, J. Chwedenczuk

Year

2013

Paper ID

31897

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation is used in quantum optics to distinguish between semi-classical and genuinely quantum electromagnetic fields. We employ the analog of the P-representation to show that the violation of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the second-order correlation function is a proof of entanglement between identical massive bosons. The presented derivation is valid both in systems with fixed and fluctuating number of particles. Thanks to the recent advances in techniques of detecting positions of separate particles, the violation of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality can be used as a simple entanglement criterion in various many-body quantum systems.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation is used in quantum optics to distinguish between semi-classical and genuinely quantum electromagnetic fields.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31897 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.