Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Foundations

A New Loophole in Recent Bell Test Experiments

arXiv
Authors: Peter Bierhorst

Year

2013

Paper ID

31861

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons. Both experiments ran multiple successive trials in fixed measurement configurations, rather than randomly re-setting the measurement configurations before each measurement trial. This opens a new potential loophole for a local hidden variable theory. The loophole invalidates one proposed method of statistical analysis of the experimental results, as demonstrated in this note. Therefore a different analysis will be necessary to definitively assert that these experiments are subject only to the locality loophole.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31861 #73561 The Trinity of Markovian Quantu... #73560 Saturating the Bayesian Nagaoka... #73554 The Complexity of Dynamical Cor... #73515 Theoretical adversarial collabo...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.