You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Comment on Partial Adiabatic Quantum Search

arXiv
Authors: Alastair Kay

Year

2013

Paper ID

31788

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

117

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The partial adiabatic search algorithm was introduced in [A. Tulsi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 052328 (2009)] as a modification of the usual adiabatic algorithm for quantum search with the idea that most of the interesting computation only happens over a very short range of the adiabatic path. By focussing on that restricted range, one can potentially gain advantage by reducing the control requirements on the system, enabling a uniform rate of evolution. In this comment, we point out an oversight in the original work [1] that invalidates its proof. However, the argument can be corrected, and the calculations in [1] are then sufficient to show that the scheme still works. Nevertheless, subsequent works [2-6] cannot all be recovered in the same way.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The partial adiabatic search algorithm was introduced in [A.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31788 #69028 Unified Framework for Functiona... #69026 Bures geodesics for non-faithfu... #69024 Cyclic ladder operators and hid... #69021 Nonreciprocal optomechanical en...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.