Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
A parallel repetition theorem for entangled two-player one-round games under product distributions
arXiv
Authors: Rahul Jain, Attila Pereszlényi, Penghui Yao
Year
2013
Paper ID
31752
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
105
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We show a parallel repetition theorem for the entangled value ω^*(G) of any two-player one-round game G where the questions (x,y) in mathcal{X}timesmathcal{Y} to Alice and Bob are drawn from a product distribution on mathcal{X}timesmathcal{Y}. We show that for the k-fold product Gk of the game G (which represents the game G played in parallel k times independently), ω^*\(Gk\) =left\(1-(1-ω^*(G\))3right)^{Ωleft\(frac{k}{log(|mathcal{A}| cdot |mathcal{B}|\)}right)}, where mathcal{A} and mathcal{B} represent the sets from which the answers of Alice and Bob are drawn.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We show a parallel repetition theorem for the entangled value ω^*(G) of any two-player one-round game G where the questions (x,y) in mathcalXtimesmathcalY to Alice and Bob are...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.