You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum Algorithms for Learning Symmetric Juntas via the Adversary Bound
arXiv
Authors: Aleksandrs Belovs
Year
2013
Paper ID
31727
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
196
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we study the following variant of the junta learning problem. We are given oracle access to a Boolean function f on n variables that only depends on k variables, and, when restricted to them, equals some predefined function h. The task is to identify the variables the function depends on. When h is the XOR or the OR function, this gives a restricted variant of the Bernstein-Vazirani or the combinatorial group testing problem, respectively. We analyse the general case using the adversary bound, and give an alternative formulation for the quantum query complexity of this problem. We construct optimal quantum query algorithms for the cases when h is the OR function complexity is $Θ(sqrt{k}) or the exact-half function \(complexity isΘ(k^{1/4}\)). The first algorithm resolves an open problem from arXiv:1210.1148. For the case whenhis the majority function, we prove an upper bound ofOk1/4. All these algorithms can be made exact. We obtain a quartic improvement when compared to the randomised complexity (ifh$ is the exact-half or the majority function), and a quadratic one when compared to the non-adaptive quantum complexity (for all functions considered in the paper).
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we study the following variant of the junta learning problem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.