Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Entanglement-swapping for X-states demands threshold values
arXiv
Authors: Ariana Muñoz, Gesa Grüning, Luis Roa
Year
2013
Paper ID
31725
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
181
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The basic entanglement-swapping scheme can be seen as a process which allows to redistribute the Bell states' properties between different pairs of a four qubits system. Achieving the task requires performing a von Neumann measurement, which projects a pair of factorized qubits randomly onto one of the four Bell states. In this work we propose a similar scheme, by performing the same Bell-von Neumann measurement over two local qubits, each one initially being correlated through an X-state with a spatially distant qubit. This process swaps the X-feature without conditions, whereas the input entanglement is partially distributed in the four possible outcome states under certain conditions. Specifically, we obtain two threshold values for the input entanglement in order for the outcome states to be nonseparable. Besides, we find that there are two possible amounts of outcome entanglement, one is greater and the other less than the input entanglement; the probability of obtaining the greatest outcome entanglement is smaller than the probability of achieving the least one. In addition, we illustrate the distribution of the entanglement for some particular and interesting initial X-states.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The basic entanglement-swapping scheme can be seen as a process which allows to redistribute the Bell states' properties between different pairs of a four qubits system.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.