Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Comparative quantum and semi-classical analysis of Atom-Field Systems II: Chaos and regularity
arXiv
Authors: M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, S. Lerma-Hernandez, J. G. Hirsch
Year
2013
Paper ID
31507
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
198
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The non-integrable Dicke model and its integrable approximation, the Tavis-Cummings (TC) model, are studied as functions of both the coupling constant and the excitation energy. The present contribution extends the analysis presented in the previous paper by focusing on the statistical properties of the quantum fluctuations in the energy spectrum and their relation with the excited state quantum phase transitions (ESQPT). These properties are compared with the dynamics observed in the semi-classical versions of the models. The presence of chaos for different energies and coupling constants is exhibited, employing Poincaré sections and Peres lattices in the classical and quantum versions, respectively. A clear correspondence between the classical and quantum result is found for systems containing between mathcal{N} = 80 to 200 atoms. A measure of the Wigner character of the energy spectrum for different couplings and energy intervals is also presented employing the statistical Anderson-Darling test. It is found that in the Dicke Model, for any coupling, a low energy regime with regular states is always present. The richness of the onset of chaos is discussed both for finite quantum systems and for the semi-classical limit, which is exact when the number of atoms in the system tends to infinite.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The non-integrable Dicke model and its integrable approximation, the Tavis-Cummings (TC) model, are studied as functions of both the coupling constant and the excitation energy.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.