Quick Navigation
Topics
Qldpc Advanced Quantum Codes
Transversal gates for quantum CSS codes
arXiv
Authors: Eduardo Camps-Moreno, Hiram H. López, Gretchen L. Matthews, Narayanan Rengaswamy, Rodrigo San-José
Year
2026
Paper ID
3145
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
111
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we focus on the problem of computing the set of diagonal transversal gates fixing a CSS code. We determine the logical actions of the gates as well as the groups of transversal gates that induce non-trivial logical gates and logical identities. We explicitly declare the set of equations defining the groups, a key advantage and differentiator of our approach. We compute the complete set of transversal stabilizers and transversal gates for any CSS code arising from monomial codes, a family that includes decreasing monomial codes and polar codes. As a consequence, we recover and extend some results in the literature on CSS-T codes, triorthogonal codes, and divisible codes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the qLDPC & Advanced Quantum Codes research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we focus on the problem of computing the set of diagonal transversal gates fixing a CSS code.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.