Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Quantum Otto cycle in the Anderson impurity model

arXiv
Authors: Salvatore Gatto, Alessandra Colla, Heinz-Peter Breuer, Michael Thoss

Year

2026

Paper ID

3142

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

0

Abstract

We study the thermodynamic performance of a periodic quantum Otto cycle operating on the single-impurity Anderson model. Using a decomposition of the time-evolution generator based on the principle of minimal dissipation, combined with the numerically exact hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) method, we analyze the operating regimes of the quantum thermal machine and investigate effects of Coulomb interactions, strong system-reservoir coupling, and energy level alignments. Our results show that Coulomb interaction can change the operating regimes and may lead to an enhancement of the efficiency.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the thermodynamic performance of a periodic quantum Otto cycle operating on the single-impurity Anderson model.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3142 #69598 The classical boundaries of the... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69591 Compact graphs and quantum auto... #69587 Semiclassical Gravity Efficient...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-20 07:47:43

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.