!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Photonic Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Entanglement distribution over 300 km of fiber

arXiv
Authors: Takahiro Inagaki, Nobuyuki Matsuda, Osamu Tadanaga, Masaki Asobe, Hiroki Takesue

Year

2013

Paper ID

31331

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

66

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report the distribution of time bin entangled photon pairs over 300 km of optical fiber. We realized this by using a high speed and high signal to noise ratio entanglement generation and evaluation setup that consists of periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides and superconducting single photon detectors. The observed two-photon interference fringes exhibited a visibility of 84 %. We confirmed the violation of Bell's inequality by 2.9 standard deviations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report the distribution of time bin entangled photon pairs over 300 km of optical fiber.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31331 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78829 Graphene double quantum dot as ... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78809 A quasiparticle-protected super...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.