Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Weak Values with Remote Postselection and Shared Entanglement

arXiv
Authors: Arun Kumar Pati, Uttam Singh

Year

2013

Paper ID

31300

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

131

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a new protocol for the weak measurement of any observable with remote pre and postselections. We show that if two parties share a pure entangled state, then by using local operations and classical communication they can preselect and postselect at distant locations leading to the weak value of an observable as a shift in the pointer of the apparatus at one location in the process of the weak measurement. This can be achieved with either sharing of a pure maximally or non-maximally entangled state. We generalize the protocol for realizing the weak value of any observable with remote pre and postselection of mixed states. Finally, we show how the weak value is modified in the remote pre and postselection setting if Alice and Bob share a mixed entangled state.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose a new protocol for the weak measurement of any observable with remote pre and postselections.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31300 #68463 Full characterization of inform... #68461 Agreement and Compatibility in ... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.