Quick Navigation
Topics
Bosonic Continuous Variable Quantum Computing
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Error-detectable Universal Control for High-Gain Bosonic Quantum Error Correction
arXiv
Authors: Weizhou Cai, Zi-Jie Chen, Ming Li, Qing-Xuan Jie, Xu-Bo Zou, Guang-Can Guo, Luyan Sun, Chang-Ling Zou
Year
2026
Paper ID
3128
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Protecting quantum information through quantum error correction (QEC) is a cornerstone of future fault-tolerant quantum computation. However, current QEC-protected logical qubits have only achieved coherence times about twice those of their best physical constituents. Here, we show that the primary barrier to higher QEC gains is ancilla-induced operational errors rather than intrinsic cavity coherence. To overcome this bottleneck, we introduce error-detectable universal control of bosonic modes, wherein ancilla relaxation events are detected and the corresponding trajectories discarded, thereby suppressing operational errors on logical qubits. For binomial codes, we demonstrate universal gates with fidelities exceeding 99.6\% and QEC gains of 8.33times beyond break-even. Our results establish that gains beyond 10times are achievable with state-of-the-art devices, establishing a path toward fault-tolerant bosonic quantum computing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Protecting quantum information through quantum error correction (QEC) is a cornerstone of future fault-tolerant quantum computation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.