Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Atomic Fock State Preparation Using Rydberg Blockade

arXiv
Authors: Matthew Ebert, Alexander Gill, Michael Gibbons, Xianli Zhang, Mark Saffman, Thad G. Walker

Year

2013

Paper ID

31202

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We use coherent excitation of 3-16 atom ensembles to demonstrate collective Rabi flopping mediated by Rydberg blockade. Using calibrated atom number measurements, we quantitatively confirm the expected sqrt{N} Rabi frequency enhancement to within 4%. The resulting atom number distributions are consistent with essentially perfect blockade. We then use collective Rabi π pulses to produce {cal N}=1,2 atom number Fock states with fidelities of 62% and 48% respectively. The {cal N}=2 Fock state shows the collective Rabi frequency enhancement without corruption from atom number fluctuations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2013 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We use coherent excitation of 3-16 atom ensembles to demonstrate collective Rabi flopping mediated by Rydberg blockade.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31202 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.