Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

New features of quantum discord uncovered by q-entropies

arXiv
Authors: A. P. Majtey, A. R. Plastino, A. Plastino

Year

2011

Paper ID

31086

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

150

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The notion of quantum discord introduced by Ollivier and Zurek [Phys. Rev. Lett 88, 017901 (2001)] (see also Henderson and Vedral [J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001)]) has attracted increasing attention, in recent years, as an entropic quantifier of non-classical features pertaining to the correlations exhibited by bipartite quantum systems. Here we generalize the notion so as to encompass power-law q-entropies that reduce to the standard Shannon entropy in the limit $q → 1$ and study the concomitant consequences. The ensuing, new discord-like measures we advance describe aspects of non-classicality that are different from those associated with the standard quantum discord. A particular manifestation of this difference concerns a feature related to order. Let D1 stand for the standard, Shannon-based discord measure and Dq for the q ne 1 one. If two quantum states A, B are such that D1(A) > D1(B), this order-relation does not remain invariant under a change from D1 to Dq.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The notion of quantum discord introduced by Ollivier and Zurek [Phys.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31086

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.