Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Maximally entangled gapped ground state of lattice fermions

arXiv
Authors: David L. Feder

Year

2011

Paper ID

31076

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

109

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Entanglement between the constituents of a quantum system is an essential resource in the implementation of many quantum processes and algorithms. Indeed, universal quantum computation is possible by measuring individual qubits comprising highly entangled cluster states. In this work it is shown that the unique gapped ground state of non-interacting fermions hopping on a specially prepared lattice is equivalent to a cluster state, where the entanglement between qubits results solely by fermionic indistinguishability and antisymmetry. A deterministic strategy for universal measurement-based quantum computation with this resource is described. Because most matter is composed of fermions, these results suggest that resources for quantum information processing might be generic in Nature.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Entanglement between the constituents of a quantum system is an essential resource in the implementation of many quantum processes and algorithms.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #31076 #68472 Non-equilibirum physics of dens... #68468 Error Exponents for Quantum Pac... #68462 Quantum Speed Limit under Calib... #68459 Expanding quantum magnetic field

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.