Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Tighter monogamy and polygamy relations in multiparty quantum systems
arXiv
Authors: Chenxiao Wang, Limin Gao
Year
2026
Paper ID
30932
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
85
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The monogamy and polygamy properties of quantum entanglement characterize fundamental constraints on the distribution of entanglement in multipartite quantum systems. In this paper, we investigate tighter monogamy and polygamy relations for multipartite entanglement. By establishing a new mathematical inequality, we derive a family of improved monogamy and polygamy inequalities for tripartite quantum systems and further extend these results to general multipartite systems. Comparisons with existing results show that the obtained bounds are tighter. Illustrative examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed relations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The monogamy and polygamy properties of quantum entanglement characterize fundamental constraints on the distribution of entanglement in multipartite quantum systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.