Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Noise-protected two-qubit gate using anisotropic exchange interaction
arXiv
Authors: Zizheng Wu, Maximilian Rimbach-Russ
Year
2026
Paper ID
30900
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Hole spin qubits hosted in Germanium quantum dots are promising candidates for scalable quantum computing. The strong spin-orbit interaction can enable fast and all-electrical quantum control. Furthermore, the platform can implement universal quantum control using only baseband signals, which may mitigate the impact of crosstalk and microwave-induced heating. At the same time, spin-orbit interaction gives rise to an anisotropic exchange interaction, whose potential for implementing two-qubit gates has remained largely unexplored. However, the current performance of operating a hole-based quantum computer is mostly limited by dephasing due to low-frequency charge noise. In this work, we propose a novel two-qubit gate protocol for Germanium hole spin qubits operated in the gapless regime. This gate protocol exploits the anisotropic exchange interaction between neighboring spins and utilizes a composite pulse scheme implemented solely through electrical baseband signals. Using this approach, we predict high-fidelity two-qubit controlled-Z operations that can suppress exchange-energy fluctuations, offering a pathway toward fault-tolerant semiconductor quantum processors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Hole spin qubits hosted in Germanium quantum dots are promising candidates for scalable quantum computing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.