Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Randomness compression in communication networks

arXiv
Authors: Yukari Uchibori, Alice Zheng, Anurag Anshu, Jamie Sikora

Year

2026

Paper ID

30875

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

87

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Given a correlation generated by a (possibly quantum) communication network, we study the amount of shared randomness required to generate it. We develop a novel upper bound for approximating distributions generated by arbitrary networks and showcase instances where it significantly outperforms the best-known upper bounds for the exact case. This demonstrates that one can have substantial savings in resources if small perturbations are acceptable. We derive our bound using Hoeffding's inequality and apply it to various commonly-used communication networks such as the Bell scenario and triangle scenario.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Given a correlation generated by a (possibly quantum) communication network, we study the amount of shared randomness required to generate it.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #30875 #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q... #78808 Experimental generation of asym...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.