Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Two-parameter bipartite entanglement measure
arXiv
Authors: Chen-Ming Bai, Yu Luo
Year
2026
Paper ID
3086
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Entanglement concurrence is an important bipartite entanglement measure that has found wide applications in quantum technologies. In this work, inspired by unified entropy, we introduce a two-parameter family of entanglement measures, referred to as the unified (q,s)-concurrence. Both the standard entanglement concurrence and the recently proposed q-concurrence emerge as special cases within this family. By combining the positive partial transposition and realignment criteria, we derive an analytical lower bound for this measure for arbitrary bipartite mixed states, revealing a connection to strong separability criteria. Explicit expressions are obtained for the unified (q,s)-concurrence in the cases of isotropic and Werner states under the constraint q>1 and qsgeq 1. Furthermore, we explore the monogamy properties of the unified (q,s)-concurrence for qgeq 2, 0leq sleq 1 and 1leq qsleq 3, in qubit systems. In addition, we derive an entanglement polygon inequality for the unified (q,s)-concurrence with qgeq 1 and qsgeq 1, which manifests the relationship among all the marginal entanglements in any multipartite qudit system.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Entanglement concurrence is an important bipartite entanglement measure that has found wide applications in quantum technologies.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.