Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Residual quantum correlations and non-Markovian noise
arXiv
Authors: Hermann L. Albrecht, David M. Bellorin
Year
2026
Paper ID
30854
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Wu et al. introduced residual quantum correlations (RQC) in 2015 and defined them in terms of two complementary bases. Given a measure for classical correlations, its optimization defines a local basis. Relative to this local basis, one defines a new one that is mutually unbiased to the first one. In the latter, the corresponding measure for quantum correlations is calculated. Local available quantum correlations (LAQC) define a measure for maximal RQC and were introduced by Mundarain and Ladron de Guevara. In previous articles, we derived an analytical exact solution for this measure for 2-qubit X states. Using those results and deriving an expression for the RQC measure introduced by Wu et al., we analyze their behavior for two non-Markovian quantum dephasing channels: Random Telegraph (RT) and Modified Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (MOU) noises. We derive general conditions for sudden death and revival of RQC in X states and illustrate these results with three families of bipartite qubit states: Werner states, Maximally Nonlocal Mixed States (MNMS), and Maximally Entangled Mixed States (MEMS).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Wu et al.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.