Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Thermodynamics
Thermodynamic Limits of Quantum Search
arXiv
Authors: Ralf Riedinger
Year
2026
Paper ID
30852
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
166
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Modern cryptography relies on keyed symmetric ciphers to ensure the secrecy and authenticity of high bandwidth data transfer. While the advent of quantum computers poses a challenge for public key cryptography, unbroken ciphers are considered safe against quantum attacks if their key is sufficiently long. However, concrete bounds on the required key length thus far remain elusive: Despite the well known asymptotic complexity of Grover's quantum search, the optimal algorithm to recover a secret key, no implementation-agnostic tight bounds were established. Here, we discuss the quantum thermodynamic limits of generic search algorithms, and find a work-runtime trade-off for autonomous computers with a fundamental lower bound. By devising an application-specific quantum protocol, which outperforms circuit and adiabatic implementations, and saturates this bound, we demonstrate that it is tight. Applying this limit, we find that a secret key of 831 bit length cannot be reconstructed deterministically in an expanding, dark-energy-dominated universe until star formation is expected to cease. Implications for post quantum cryptography, and quantum key distribution are discussed.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Modern cryptography relies on keyed symmetric ciphers to ensure the secrecy and authenticity of high bandwidth data transfer.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.