Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Software Tools Programming

Multipartite entanglement measures based on the thermodynamic framework

arXiv
Authors: Chen-Ming Bai, Yu Luo

Year

2026

Paper ID

3085

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work, we introduce a unified method to characterize and measure multipartite entanglement using the framework of thermodynamics. A family of the new entanglement measures is proposed: ergotropic-gap concentratable entanglement. Furthermore, we establish that ergotropic-gap concentratable entanglement constitutes a well-defined entanglement measure within a specific parameter regime, satisfying key properties including continuity, majorization monotonicity and monogamy. We demonstrate the utility of this measure by showing it effectively distinguishes between multi-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states and W states. It also proves effective in detecting entanglement in specific classes of four-partite star quantum network states.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work, we introduce a unified method to characterize and measure multipartite entanglement using the framework of thermodynamics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3085

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.