Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Directly estimating the fidelity of measurement-based quantum computation
arXiv
Authors: David T. Stephen, Michael Foss-Feig
Year
2026
Paper ID
30848
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC), quantum circuits are implemented using adaptive measurements on an entangled resource state. In practice, the resource state will always be prepared with some noise, and it is crucial to understand the effect of this noise on the operation of MBQC. Typically, one measures the fidelity of the noisy resource state with the assumption that a high fidelity state means a high fidelity computation. However, the precise relationship between these two fidelities is not known. Here, we derive an expression that equates the average fidelity of the MBQC output state to a certain correlation function evaluated on the noisy resource state. Using this expression, we show that state fidelity provides a tight lower bound on average MBQC fidelity. Conversely, we also find that state fidelity can greatly underestimate average MBQC fidelity, implying that state fidelity is not a good indicator of MBQC performance in general. In response, we formulate an efficient method to directly estimate average MBQC fidelity by measuring the aforementioned correlation function. These results therefore improve our ability to characterize noisy resource states in quantum computers and benchmark MBQC performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In measurement-based quantum computation (MBQC), quantum circuits are implemented using adaptive measurements on an entangled resource state.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.