Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Thermodynamics
Neural network backflow for ab-initio solid calculations
arXiv
Authors: An-Jun Liu, Bryan K. Clark
Year
2026
Paper ID
30790
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Accurately simulating extended periodic systems is a central challenge in condensed matter physics. Neural quantum states (NQS) offer expressive wavefunctions for this task but face issues with scalability. In this work, we successfully extend the neural network backflow (NNBF) approach to ab-initio solid-state materials. Building on our scalable optimization framework for molecules [Liu et al., PRB 112, 155162 (2025)], we introduce a two-stage pruning strategy to manage the massive configuration space expansions: by utilizing a computationally cheap, physics-informed importance proxy, we devote exact NNBF amplitude evaluations solely to the most relevant determinants, significantly improving optimization efficiency, energy estimation, and convergence. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across diverse solid-state benchmarks. For 1D hydrogen chains, NNBF matches or surpasses DMRG and AFQMC, remains robust in strongly correlated bond-breaking regimes where coupled-cluster methods fail, and smoothly extrapolates to the thermodynamic limit. We further demonstrate its scalability by computing ground-state potential energy curves for 2D graphene and 3D silicon. Finally, ablation studies validate the computational savings of our pruning strategy and highlight the dependence of the NNBF energies on basis sets.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Accurately simulating extended periodic systems is a central challenge in condensed matter physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.