Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Noise Suppression at Scale with Crosstalk-Robust Gate Sets
arXiv
Authors: Andy J. Goldschmidt, Emilio Peláez Cisneros, Ryan Sitler, Kevin Olsson, Kaitlin N. Smith, Gregory Quiroz
Year
2026
Paper ID
30739
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce crosstalk-robust gate sets, which are obtained using a novel, scalable optimal control problem exploiting locality. Through the suppression of pairwise quantum crosstalk, the gate sets enable robustness that extends to multi-qubit circuits. The IBM Quantum Platform devices provide a testbed for our gate sets, where we study their efficacy via error suppression protocols and randomized parallel single-qubit circuits of up to eight qubits. Furthermore, we provide the first known assessment of the impact of complete optimal control gate sets on quantum algorithms. Using a Hamiltonian simulation of a four-qubit transverse field Ising model, we show that noise-informed gates enhance median algorithmic performance by a factor of four over baseline Gaussian gates using the same calibration procedures. Lastly, we provide numerical evidence that optimized gate sets enable larger qubit-qubit coupling strengths that can cut two-qubit gate times in half. This result confirms that hardware-software co-design using quantum optimal control can create new opportunities for quantum computing architectures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce crosstalk-robust gate sets, which are obtained using a novel, scalable optimal control problem exploiting locality.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.