Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Comment on: "Coherent perfect absorption: Zero reflection without linewidth suppression"
arXiv
Authors: Rui-Chang Shen, Jie Li
Year
2026
Paper ID
30651
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A recent paper, Phys. Rev. Research 8, 013261 (2026), claims that the polaromechanical normal-mode splitting (NMS) measured in Nat. Commun. 16, 5652 (2025) is not true based on their two results: i) there is no true splitting in the linear-scale spectrum; ii) the total or intrinsic decay rate of the cavity-magnon polariton, set by the imaginary part of the pole of the total output spectrum, remains unchanged under the coherent-perfect-absorption (CPA) condition. In this comment, we indicate that i) there is NMS in both the linear and logarithmic scales of our spectra in {\it a narrow frequency range} around the CPA frequency; ii) the total decay rate defined via the {\it pole} of the spectrum cannot characterize the vanishing {\it effective} decay rate at the CPA frequency (known as the monochromaticity of the CPA), and thus this parameter is irrelevant to the NMS measured in our experiment in {\it a narrow frequency range} around the CPA frequency. Consequently, their results above are either false or irrelevant, and thus cannot support their claim on the polaromechanical strong coupling measured in our experiment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A recent paper, Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.