Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Preprocessing noise in finite-size quantum key distribution
arXiv
Authors: Gabriele Staffieri, Giuseppe D'Ambruoso, Giovanni Scala, Cosmo Lupo
Year
2026
Paper ID
30591
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is known that preprocessing noise may boost quantum key distribution by expanding the range of values of tolerated noise. For BB84, adding trusted noise may allow the generation of secret keys even for qubit error rate (QBER) beyond the 11% threshold in the asymptotic regime. Here we study the effect of preprocessing noise in the finite-size regime where only a limited number of signals are exchanged between Alice and Bob. We compute tight numerical lower bounds in terms of the sandwiched Rényi entropy of order alpha, optimized via a two-step Frank-Wolfe algorithm, in the presence of a trusted flipping probability q. We find that trusted noise improves the key rate only for a finite interval of alpha, from the alpha -> 1 limit up to alpha approx 1.4. By optimizing on the value of alpha, we determine finite-size key rates for different values of the QBER, observing enhancement due to trusted noise both in asymptotic and finite-size regimes. Finally, we determine the maximum tolerable QBER as a function of the block size.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is known that preprocessing noise may boost quantum key distribution by expanding the range of values of tolerated noise.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.