Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Resonances, Recurrence Times and Steady States in Monitored Noisy Qubit Systems
arXiv
Authors: Shuanger Ma, Sabine Tornow, Eli Barkai
Year
2026
Paper ID
30547
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study non-equilibrium steady states and recurrence times in noisy, stroboscopically monitored qubit systems using complete measurements. In the noiseless limit, recurrence times are integer-quantized, with dips to lower integers when sampling approaches revival conditions associated with ergodicity breaking. Using an IBM quantum platform, we find that quantization is robust when sampling far from revivals, but breaks down dramatically near revivals: even weak noise produces large deviations and can invert the expected dips into pronounced peaks. To explain this behavior, we formulate a statistical-physics model of monitored noisy circuits in which monitoring drives an effective infinite-temperature steady state while thermal-like relaxation competes to favor a low-temperature limit. We show that the sampling time tunes a crossover between these regimes, near revivals stabilizing low-temperature behavior, and far from revivals restoring infinite-temperature behavior - with noise strength and detuning acting as coupled small parameters near resonance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study non-equilibrium steady states and recurrence times in noisy, stroboscopically monitored qubit systems using complete measurements.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.