Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gate Fidelity Benchmarking
Fundamental Limits of Large Momentum Transfer in Optical Lattices
arXiv
Authors: Ashkan Alibabaei, Patrik Mönkeberg, Florian Fitzek, Alexandre Gauguet, Baptiste Allard, Klemens Hammerer, Naceur Gaaloul
Year
2026
Paper ID
3046
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
140
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Large-momentum-transfer techniques are instrumental for the next generation of atom interferometers as they significantly improve their sensitivity. State-of-the-art implementations rely on elastic scattering processes from optical lattices such as Bloch oscillations or sequential Bragg diffraction, but their performance is constrained by imperfect pulse efficiencies. Here we develop a Floquet-based theoretical framework that provides a unified description of elastic light-atom scattering across all relevant regimes. Within this formalism, we identify practical regimes that exhibit orders of magnitude reduced losses and improved phase accuracy compared to previous implementations. The model's validity is established through direct comparison with exact numerical solutions of the Schrödinger equation and through quantitative agreement with recent experimental benchmark results. These findings delineate previously unexplored operating regimes for large-momentum-transfer beam splitters and open new perspectives for precision atom-interferometric measurements in fundamental physics, gravity gradiometry or gravitational wave detection.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gate Fidelity & Benchmarking research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Large-momentum-transfer techniques are instrumental for the next generation of atom interferometers as they significantly improve their sensitivity.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.