Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Aharonov-Bohm effect in quantum nanocups

DOAJ
Authors: Carlos Leonardo Beltrán Ríos, Harold Paredes Gutiérrez

Year

2014

Paper ID

30418

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

0

Abstract

The Aharonov-Bohm effect had been studied in semiconductor ring system and type II quantum dots, different authors had considered the asymmetric effect in the shape of the ring and the effect on Aharonov-Bohm oscillation due to impurities in the structure. In this report is considering the effect of a magnetic field applied on the electron energy inside in a quantum nanocup. The energy is calculated using a vibrational procedure in the effective mass framework. The results show the influence of the shape of a nanocup on the electron energy and smooth oscillation in the ground state energy as a function of the magnetic field.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Aharonov-Bohm effect had been studied in semiconductor ring system and type II quantum dots, different authors had considered the asymmetric effect in the shape of the ring...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #30418 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 20:36:05

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.