Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Magneto-Exciton Energy in Cylindrical Indium Arsenide Quantum Dots Affected by External Parameters
DOAJ
Authors: Marwan Zuhair Elias
Year
2025
Paper ID
30403
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
97
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The effects of temperature, pressure, and an applied magnetic field on the energies of a cylindrical layer of indium arsenide (InAs) quantum dots, with and without Coulomb interaction, are investigated. Exciton energy depends significantly on these parameters. The results show that the ground-state and excited-state energies increase with rising temperature and applied magnetic field (blue shift), but that both energy states decrease with increasing pressure (red shift). As the temperature increases for higher states, the sensitivity of magneto-exciton energy also increases. The outcomes obtained for layered and ring-shaped systems exhibit a universal quality, making them particularly interesting.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The effects of temperature, pressure, and an applied magnetic field on the energies of a cylindrical layer of indium arsenide (InAs) quantum dots, with and without Coulomb...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.