Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Self-Consistent Electrostatic Modeling of Gated Narrow-Gap Topological Insulators.
PubMed
Authors: Hofer M, Fuchs C, Siebert M, Berger C, Fürst L, Stehno MP, Schreyeck S, Buhmann H, Kießling T, Beugeling W, Molenkamp LW
Year
2026
Paper ID
30263
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Even small electrostatic potentials can dramatically influence the band structure of narrow-gap semiconductors. A quantitative understanding often necessitates a self-consistent Hartree approach. The valence and conduction band states strongly hybridize and/or cross in these systems. This results in failure of the standard effective-mass theory, which relies on a clear distinction between electrons and holes and assumes a flat charge carrier distribution at the charge neutrality point. We show that the alternative full-band envelope-function approach [Andlauer and Vogl , 2009, 80, 035304], which we have implemented into the open-source band structure software package kdotpy [Beugeling et al. , 2025, 47], gives numerically stable and quantitatively accurate results where the conventional method fails. We find excellent agreement in modeling the experimental subband density evolution with top-gate voltage in thick (26 nm-107 nm), topologically inverted HgTe quantum wells. We expect our openly available implementation to greatly benefit the investigation of narrow-, broken-, and inverted-gap materials.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Even small electrostatic potentials can dramatically influence the band structure of narrow-gap semiconductors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.