Quick Navigation
Topics
Variational Hybrid Quantum Algorithms
Qubit Coherence Noise Stability Characterization
Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering
Quantum Control Electronics System Integration
Role of smoke withering process in the bitterness amelioration effect on smoked Lapsang Souchong tea.
PubMed
Authors: Su W, Ni L, Wang D, Lu Y, Liu W, Feng X, Liu Y, Liu Z
Year
2026
Paper ID
30147
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
146
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Smoked Lapsang Souchong tea (SLST) is renowned for its unique smoky aroma and relatively low bitterness, attributed to the pinewood smoke withering (SW) process. This study investigated the role of SW in reducing SLST bitterness through an integrated approach. Electronic tongue analysis, sensory evaluation, and cell-based calcium imaging assay confirmed that SW significantly reduced tea bitterness. Untargeted metabolomics revealed SW substantially decreased key bitter phenolics, including 10 monomeric catechins, 14 glycosylated flavonols, and 6 galloylated phenolic acids. Concurrently, key pinewood smoke odorants, guaiacol and α-terpineol, directly inhibited TAS2R14 activation by pre-smoke withered tea extract, reducing intracellular calcium signaling by 37% and 21%, respectively. Quantum chemistry calculations further demonstrated that these odorants readily interact with bitter compounds primarily through intermolecular hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces, suggesting a potential mechanism for inhibiting bitter taste signaling. This study provides novel insights into how smoke withering refines tea flavor by attenuating bitterness.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Variational & Hybrid Quantum Algorithms research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Smoked Lapsang Souchong tea (SLST) is renowned for its unique smoky aroma and relatively low bitterness, attributed to the pinewood smoke withering (SW) process.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.