Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

The Quantum Learning Menagerie (A survey on Quantum learning for Classical concepts)

arXiv
Authors: Sagnik Chatterjee

Year

2026

Paper ID

3014

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

86

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper surveys various results in the field of Quantum Learning theory, specifically focusing on learning quantum-encoded classical concepts in the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) framework. The cornerstone of this work is the emphasis on query, sample, and time complexity separations between classical and quantum learning that emerge under learning with query access to different labeling oracles. This paper aims to consolidate all known results in the area under the above umbrella and underscore the limits of our understanding by leaving the reader with 23 open problems.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This paper surveys various results in the field of Quantum Learning theory, specifically focusing on learning quantum-encoded classical concepts in the Probably Approximately...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3014 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a... #69003 QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.