!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Suppressing leakage and maintaining robustness in transmon qubits : Signatures of a trade-off relation
OpenAlex
Authors: Pablo M․ Poggi, Anthony Kiely
Year
2026
Paper ID
29954
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
154
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the problem of optimally generating quantum gates in a logical subspace embedded in a larger Hilbert space, where the dynamics is also affected by unknown static imperfections. This general problem is widespread across various emergent quantum technology architectures. We derive the fidelity susceptibility in the computational subspace as a measure of robustness to perturbations, and define a cost function that quantifies leakage out of the subspace. We tackle both effects using a two-stage optimization where two cost functions are minimized in series. Specifically, we apply this framework to the generation of single-qubit gates in a superconducting transmon system, and find high-fidelity solutions robust to detuning and amplitude errors across various parameter regimes. We also show control pulses which maximize fidelity while minimizing leakage at all times during the evolution. However, finding control solutions that address both effects simultaneously is shown to be much more challenging, indicating the presence of a trade-off relation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the problem of optimally generating quantum gates in a logical subspace embedded in a larger Hilbert space, where the dynamics is also affected by unknown static...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.