Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
On Quantum Learning Advantage Under Symmetries
arXiv
Authors: Tuyen Nguyen, Mária Kieferová, Amira Abbas
Year
2026
Paper ID
2979
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
179
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Symmetry underlies many of the most effective classical and quantum learning algorithms, yet whether quantum learners can gain a fundamental advantage under symmetry-imposed structures remains an open question. Based on evidence that classical statistical query $SQ$ frameworks have revealed exponential query complexity in learning symmetric function classes, we ask: can quantum learning algorithms exploit the problem symmetry better? In this work, we investigate the potential benefits of symmetry within the quantum statistical query $QSQ$ model, which is a natural quantum analog of classical SQ. Our results uncover three distinct phenomena: (i) we obtain an exponential separation between QSQ and SQ on a permutation-invariant function class; (ii) we establish query complexity lower bounds for QSQ learning that match, up to constant factors, the corresponding classical SQ lower bounds for most commonly studied symmetries; however, the potential advantages may occur under highly skewed orbit distributions; and (iii) we further identify a tolerance-based separation exists, where quantum learners succeed at noise levels that render classical SQ algorithms ineffective. Together, these findings provide insight into when symmetry can enable quantum advantage in learning.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Symmetry underlies many of the most effective classical and quantum learning algorithms, yet whether quantum learners can gain a fundamental advantage under symmetry-imposed...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.