You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Single Spin Logic Implementation of VLSI Adders
arXiv
Authors: Soumitra Shukla, Bahniman Ghosh
Year
2011
Paper ID
29606
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Some important VLSI adder circuits are implemented using quantum dots (qd) and Spin Polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (SPSTM) in Single Spin Logic (SSL) paradigm. A simple comparison between these adder circuits shows that the mirror adder implementation in SSL does not carry any advantage over CMOS adder in terms of complexity and number of qds, opposite to the trend observed in their charge-based counterparts. On the contrary, the transmission gate adder, Static and Dynamic Manchester carry gate adders in SSL reduce the complexity and number of qds, in harmony with the trend shown in transistor adders.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Some important VLSI adder circuits are implemented using quantum dots (qd) and Spin Polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (SPSTM) in Single Spin Logic (SSL) paradigm.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.