Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Validating a Koopman-Quantum Hybrid Paradigm for Diagnostic Denoising of Fusion Devices
arXiv
Authors: Tie-Jun Wang, Run-Qing Zhang, Ling Qian, Yun-Tao Song, Ting Lan, Hai-Qing Liu, Keren Li
Year
2026
Paper ID
2935
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The potential of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) in data-intensive science is strictly bottlenecked the difficulty of interfacing high-dimensional, chaotic classical data into resource-limited, noisy quantum processors. To bridge this gap, we introduce a physics-informed Koopman-Quantum hybrid framework, theoretically grounded in a representation-level structural isomorphism we establish between the Koopman operator, which linearizes nonlinear dynamics, and quantum evolution. Based on this theoretical foundation, we design a realizable NISQ-friendly pipeline: the Koopman operator functions as a physics-aware "data distiller," compressing waveforms into compact, "quantum-ready" features, which are subsequently processed by a modular, parallel quantum neural network. We validated this framework on 4,763 labeled channel sequences from 433 discharges of the tokamak system. The results demonstrate that our model achieves 97.0% accuracy in screening corrupted diagnostic data, matching the performance of state-of-the-art deep classical CNNs while using orders-of-magnitude fewer trainable parameters. This work establishes a practical, physics-grounded paradigm for leveraging quantum processing in constrained environments, offering a scalable path for quantum-enhanced edge computing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The potential of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) in data-intensive science is strictly bottlenecked the difficulty of interfacing high-dimensional, chaotic classical data into...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.