Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Tight Bell inequalities with no quantum violation from qubit unextendible product bases
arXiv
Authors: R. Augusiak, T. Fritz, M. Kotowski, M. Kotowski, M. Pawłowski, M. Lewenstein, A. Acín
Year
2011
Paper ID
29224
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
161
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the relation between unextendible product bases (UPB) and Bell inequalities found recently in [R. Augusiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070401 (2011)]. We first review the procedure introduced there that associates to any set of mutually orthogonal product vectors in a many-qubit Hilbert space a Bell inequality. We then show that if a set of mutually orthogonal product vectors can be completed to a full basis, then the associated Bell inequality is trivial, in the sense of not being violated by any nonsignalling correlations. This implies that the relevant Bell inequalities that arise from the construction all come from UPBs, which adds additional weight to the significance of UPBs for Bell inequalities. Then, we provide new examples of tight Bell inequalities with no quantum violation constructed from UPBs in this way. Finally, it is proven that the Bell inequalities with no quantum violation introduced recently in [M. Almeida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230404 (2010)] are tight for any odd number of parties.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the relation between unextendible product bases (UPB) and Bell inequalities found recently in [R.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.