Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Reply on "Comment on 'Role of initial entanglement and non-Gaussianity in the decoherence of photon-number entangled states evolving in a noisy channel' "
arXiv
Authors: Michele Allegra, Paolo Giorda, Matteo G. A. Paris
Year
2011
Paper ID
29218
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In a recent work (Allegra et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 100503, 2010) we addressed the evolution of photon-number entangled states in noisy Gaussian channels. Upon exploiting several non equivalent separability criteria we found evidence that entanglement of Gaussian PNES survives longer, and thus we drew a conjecture about the generality of this result. In their Comment to our work, Lee et al. use an additional entanglement criterion (NDPT) which allows them to show some counterexamples to our conjecture, i.e., nonGaussian states whose entanglement survives longer. In this reply, we argue that although there are no flaws or central errors in our original Letter, the conjecture is not maintanable in a strict sense if one includes the NDPT criterion. Nevertheless, for the examples of non Gaussian states proposed in the Comment, which violate the conjecture, the residual entanglement is extremely low. Therefore it remains an open question whether these, as well as other kinds of states, could represent a useful resource in quantum communication protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In a recent work (Allegra et al, Phys.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.