Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Resonant Matter Wave Amplification in Mean Field Theory
arXiv
Authors: Tri Cao Doan, Yuping Huang, Steve F. Wolf, Michael G. Moore
Year
2011
Paper ID
29217
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We develop a Green's function based mean-field theory for coherent mixing of matter- and light-waves. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we analyse a co-propagating Raman matter-wave amplifier. We find that for a given laser intensity, a significantly faster amplification process can be achieved employing resonant rather than off-resonance driving. The ratio of the matter-wave gain to atom loss-rate due to spontaneous emission is given by the optical depth of the sample, and is the same both on- and off-resonance. Furthermore, we show that for short-times, the single-mode approximation for the matter-waves gives exact agreement with the full spatial dynamics. For long times, the off-resonant case shows suppressed amplification due to a spatially inhomogenous AC Stark shift associated with laser depletion. This suppression is absent on-resonance, where the AC Stark shift is absent.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We develop a Green's function based mean-field theory for coherent mixing of matter- and light-waves.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.