Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Quantum Chemistry

A Transfer Matrix Method for Resonances in Randall-Sundrum Models II: The Deformed Case

arXiv
Authors: R. R. Landim, G. Alencar, M. O. Tahim, R. N. Costa Filho

Year

2011

Paper ID

29018

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Here we consider resonances of the Gauge, Gravity and Spinor fields in Randall-Sundrum-like scenarios. We consider membranes that are generated by a class of topological defects that are deformed domain walls obtained from other previously known ones. They are obtained by a deformation procedure generate different potentials to the associated Schrödinger-like equation. The resonance spectra are calculated numerically using the method of Transfer Matrix developed by the authors and presented in JHEP 1108 (2011) 071. The new deformed defects change the resonances spectra of all fields considered and the associated phenomenology as well.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Here we consider resonances of the Gauge, Gravity and Spinor fields in Randall-Sundrum-like scenarios.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #29018 #69978 Distribution Complexity of Elec... #69974 Hierarchical separation of rela... #69971 Quantum-enhanced estimation of ... #69966 Schur--Horn bound on field-free...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.